TagToytota Trial

Toyota Settlement FAQs and Other Shocking Info re: Electronic Throttle Settlement/Criminal Charges

I came across this today while searching on the internet. Simply shocking what Toyota gets away with even when there was proof of criminal activity. Our U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder would not have filed criminal charges unless there was proof of criminal activity.

A must read.  I shouldn’t be shocked, but I am (once again).

Here’s one paragraph from the FAQs: “Both sides in the lawsuit agreed to a settlement to avoid the cost and risk of further litigation, including a potential trial, and so that the Class Members can get benefits, in exchange for releasing Toyota from liability. The settlement does not mean that Toyota broke any laws and/or did anything wrong, and the Court did not decide which side was right.”

https://www.toyotaelsettlement.com/Home/FAQ

1996 Toyota Camry Defect Design Revealed in U.S. Federal Court Today 1-14-15

Court events from January 14, 2015 Toyota Lawsuit

Two wonderful things to post about. 1) The design defect in some ’96 Camry throttle body units (accelerator control system) was proven in court today. The accelerator control system (ACS) on the 1996 Camry has two pulleys in it that control the accelerator cable (which is attached to the gas pedal). Well in Koua Fong Lee’s ’96 Camry (and some other ’96 Camrys) those two pulleys are made of plastic. The side of the upper plastic pulley butts up against a metal bracket and that metal bracket sits just inches from the engine. When that throttle body and metal plate heat up, the upper plastic pulley can bind up and won’t release the accelerator cable.  It gets stuck to the metal bracket (at times).

When Koua’s lawyer asked the expert (John Stilson) what he used to heat up the throttle body, John said he used a hair dryer. Many in the courtroom were surprised. Koua’s lawyer asked Mr. Stilson why he used a hair dryer and Mr. Stilson said, “because that’s what is listed in the 1996 Toyota Camry Service Manual to test for malfunction due to heat”. It took Mr. Stilson only 30 mins to heat the throttle body to 165 deg F and he conducted five tests (four shown on video in court) to record how that heat affected the upper plastic pulley and caused it bind up and stick to the metal bracket. It took between 5 and 7 minutes for the upper pulley to cool down and release the accelerator cable.

John Stilson designed a different accelerator system completely eliminating the need for a throttle body, to show how easy it is to design the accelerator/throttle system which won’t cause the accelerator cable to stick.

The other wonderful testimony today was by Andrew Irwin who specializes in reconstruction of accidents. Since the accident in June, 2006, Toyota and other experts have claimed that Koua’s brakes were in good working condition. But today Koua’s lawyer asked Andrew if he did any tests to check the brake vacuum assist system in Koua’s car. With no vacuum pressure in brakes, you have what’s called “hard brakes”. When the inspectors checked Koua’s vacuum assist system, they noted there was no vacuum pressure in the system. Mr. Irwin said one of the inspectors/experts pumped in 25 inches of vacuum pressure into Koua’s brake vacuum assist system and it filled the system. After stepping on the brake pedal one time, they lost 40% of the vacuum pressure. After releasing the brake and stepping on the brake one more time, they lost all vacuum pressure in Koua’s brakes. This explains why Koua had lost his brakes after stepping on them twice when he swerved between the first two cars he came upon on the exit ramp – that’s when he lost all vacuum pressure in his brakes. By the time he came upon the Oldsmobile stopped at the red light ahead, there was no vacuum pressure left in his brake system. Keep in mind he had only 550 feet (5.1 seconds) to react when he realized his brakes were not working properly.

Never once since Koua’s accident in 2006 has Toyota been able to prove that Koua did NOT step on the brakes. Put aside trying to prove that he DID step on the brakes. They can not prove that he didn’t. If they could prove that, they would have by now. There’s no way Koua’s brake vacuum assist system would have been depleted of vacuum pressure if he had not stepped on his brakes.

Toyota Lawsuit for 1996 Camry – Day 3 of Testimony in Federal Court

Today Andrew Irwin took the stand, he reconstructs accidents and one of the software programs he uses in determining some of his results is called ED-SMAC. He showed a blown up picture of Koua Fong Lee’s left rear brake light bulb, specifically focusing on the filament. He said the filament reached 2000 degrees in the breake bulb from Koua’s  car and due to the shape of the filament, he is 100% certain that Koua was stepping on the brakes at the time of impact. Lawyer asked Andrew if there was anything else that could possibly cause this filament to act and look how it does and Andrew responded, “No”.  Toyota’s defense for this case has always been and still is that Koua never stepped on the brake and that he accidentally stepped on the gas instead.

The main defense attorney on this case is Bob Hilliard. He was one of the attorneys handling the BP oil spill in southern United States and he is also involved in the GM lawsuit. In his opening statement during this particular lawsuit which is being held before The Honorable Judge Ann Montgomery in Minneapolis Federal Court, Bob showed a hugely blown up image of a  test method/spec that Toyota uses when testing their Accelerator Control System (ACS) on the 1996 Camrys before determining if they are safe and reliable enough to release for sale. Turns out, the pulleys in all the ACS units that Toyota tested are metal pulleys. Well Koua’s ACS unit does not contain metal pulleys, they are plastic. These pulleys control the accelerator cable and this ACS unit sits just inches from the engine and the ACS unit is not fully encapsulated. The cover to the ACS unit goes around and on top of the unit, but the bottom is not covered at all. There is also no scheduled or required or suggested maintenance in any of Toyota’s manuals for these ACS units. Since this information was made during an opening statement, it has not been proven just yet. Testimony on that is coming Tuesday.

Will post a blog after court on Tuesday.

Toyota Lawsuit Begins on January 7, 2015 in Minneapolis

First time Toyota is being sued for the mechanical throttle in their 1996 Camry. American Family Insurance is one of the parties suing. Pre trial motions are being heard on January 6th before The Honorable Judge Ann Montgomery at the Minneapolis Federal Courthouse. Jury selection will begin on January 7th and the trial is expected to start on January 8th.

It is not right that a consumer is blamed for a defective design or part. Let’s not forget that 44 people came forward who signed affidavits stating they experienced the same sudden unintended acceleration with complete loss of brakes after Koua Fong Lee was sentenced to eight years in prison. I heard eleven of their testimonies myself. If a baby died due to a defective crib, would the parents be blamed? or the manufacturer of the crib? Why does Toyota still blame the driver/s?

A floor mat issue? Really?  Who would design a floor mat that would cause such an event anyway.

Our own Attorney General filed CRIMINAL charges against Toyota, and instead of prosecuting, agreed to a $1.2 billion dollar settlement. That means there was proof of criminal activity by Toyota.

Stay tuned for details on the upcoming Toyota lawsuit. I will be attending it.

Toyota Lawsuit in Minneapolis Moved to January, 2015

The lawsuit against Toyota for the mechanical throttle in the ’95 and ’96 Camry that was due to begin today has been moved to January, 2015. Pretrial motions will be heard Monday, November 10th before The Honorable Judge Ann Montgomery at the Federal Courthouse in Minneapolis. I’m sad for those who thought they could end this year by working on putting this horrific accident behind them.

First Lawsuit Regarding Mechanical Throttle in Toyota’s Sudden Unintended Acceleration Starts November 3, 2014

I should have mentioned in my last blog that the trial beginning November 3, 2014 before the Honorable Judge Ann Montgomery is the first lawsuit against Toyota for the mechanical throttle in the ’96 and ’95 Camry. Depending on the outcome of this two week trial, many more lawsuits could follow.

Like I said last week, when over 40 people come forward signing an affidavit claiming the exact same sudden unintended acceleration (accompanied by complete loss of brakes) happened in their ’96 or ’95 Camry, obviously something is wrong.

I used to find it surprising that many of these drivers brought their vehicles to a dealer or mechanic only to find no fault code had shown up in the computer indicating anything had gone wrong; but, now that I have learned there IS no fault code for SUA, it all makes sense. SUA is completely non traceable. However, that doesn’t mean something didn’t go wrong.

Looking forward to this trial and hoping for justice to prevail.

Lawsuit Against Toyota begins November 3, 2014 in Minneapolis Federal Courthouse

This trial is expected to last two weeks and will start on November 3, 2014 before the Honorable Judge Ann Montgomery at 9:00 a.m. Some of the parties that have filed suit against Toyota in this case include American Family Insurance, Trice and Adams family members (they lost their loved ones in the accident which took place in June of 2006), and others who were injured during the accident.

The accident involved a 1996 Toyota Camry that suddenly unintentionally accelerated as the driver was exiting the highway in St. Paul, MN. He tried stopping the vehicle more than once, but the brakes did not work. Dozens of other drivers came forward after the driver was imprisoned claiming the exact same thing happened to them in the same make and model vehicle. Some of those cars were manufactured at the same plant as the driver’s car, one on the same production line (assembled within minutes of each other). Sounds to me like something is wrong with the vehicle and it is not driver error. Just a hunch though.

Stay tuned.

© 2017 A Road to Freedom

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑